Tailwind CSS: Is It Worth the Hype?
A comprehensive review of Tailwind CSS, examining its utility-first approach, developer experience, and whether it lives up to the hype in 2024.
Tailwind CSS: Is It Worth the Hype?
Tailwind CSS has taken the frontend development world by storm. With over 70k GitHub stars and millions of weekly downloads, it's become one of the most popular CSS frameworks. But is it actually good, or just trendy? After using it extensively for 18 months, here's my honest review.
Overall Rating: 4.5/5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐½
Tailwind CSS is an excellent utility-first CSS framework that dramatically speeds up development once you get past the initial learning curve. It's not perfect, but it's very, very good.
What is Tailwind CSS?
Unlike traditional CSS frameworks (Bootstrap, Material UI), Tailwind takes a utility-first approach. Instead of predefined components, you get low-level utility classes:
<!-- Traditional CSS -->
<div class="card">
<h2 class="card-title">Hello</h2>
<p class="card-description">World</p>
</div>
<!-- Tailwind CSS -->
<div class="bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md p-6">
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-2">Hello</h2>
<p class="text-gray-600">World</p>
</div>
The Good: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
1. Development Speed
Once you know the classes, you can style components incredibly fast:
<button class="bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-700 text-white font-bold py-2 px-4 rounded">
Click me
</button>
No context switching between HTML and CSS files. No naming classes. Just style and move on.
2. Consistency
Tailwind's design system ensures visual consistency:
- Spacing scale: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4... (0rem, 0.25rem, 0.5rem, 0.75rem, 1rem...)
- Color palette: Consistent colors with shades 50-900
- Typography scale: text-xs, text-sm, text-base, text-lg...
<!-- These will always be consistent -->
<div class="p-4"><!-- 1rem padding -->
<div class="m-4"><!-- 1rem margin -->
<div class="space-y-4"><!-- 1rem gap between children -->
3. Performance
Tailwind's PurgeCSS integration removes unused styles:
Before purge:
- Full Tailwind: ~3.8MB
After purge (production):
- Typical app: 10-20KB
That's a 99%+ reduction!
4. Responsive Design
Mobile-first responsive design is trivial:
<div class="text-sm md:text-base lg:text-lg xl:text-xl">
Responsive text
</div>
<div class="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3 gap-4">
<!-- Responsive grid -->
</div>
5. Dark Mode
Dark mode support is built-in:
<div class="bg-white dark:bg-gray-800 text-black dark:text-white">
Automatic dark mode support
</div>
6. Customization
Easy to customize via tailwind.config.js:
module.exports = {
theme: {
extend: {
colors: {
primary: '#1E40AF',
secondary: '#7C3AED',
},
fontFamily: {
sans: ['Inter', 'system-ui'],
},
},
},
}
7. Component Extraction
For repeated patterns, use @apply:
.btn-primary {
@apply bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-700 text-white font-bold py-2 px-4 rounded;
}
8. Ecosystem
Rich plugin ecosystem:
@tailwindcss/forms: Better form styles@tailwindcss/typography: Beautiful prose@tailwindcss/aspect-ratio: Aspect ratio utilities@tailwindcss/line-clamp: Text truncation
The Not-So-Good: ⭐⭐⭐ (3/5)
1. Learning Curve
The initial learning curve is steep. Memorizing class names takes time:
<!-- What does this even mean? -->
<div class="flex items-center justify-between">
Tip: Use the Tailwind IntelliSense extension for VS Code!
2. HTML Bloat
Your HTML can become verbose:
<button class="inline-flex items-center px-4 py-2 border border-transparent text-sm font-medium rounded-md shadow-sm text-white bg-indigo-600 hover:bg-indigo-700 focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-offset-2 focus:ring-indigo-500">
That's a lot of classes!
</button>
3. Reading Others' Code
Understanding someone else's Tailwind code can be challenging:
<!-- Quick, what does this look like? -->
<div class="relative z-10 flex-shrink-0 flex h-16 bg-white shadow">
4. Not Always Semantic
Utility classes aren't semantic:
<!-- What is this? A button? A link? -->
<div class="cursor-pointer bg-blue-500 text-white p-4 rounded">
Click me
</div>
5. Team Buy-In
Your whole team needs to be on board. Mixing Tailwind with traditional CSS is messy.
Comparison with Alternatives
vs. Bootstrap
Bootstrap:
- ✅ Predefined components
- ✅ Easier for beginners
- ✗ Less flexible
- ✗ Looks "Bootstrap-y"
Tailwind:
- ✅ Maximum flexibility
- ✅ Unique designs
- ✗ Steeper learning curve
- ✗ No predefined components
Verdict: Tailwind for custom designs, Bootstrap for quick MVPs
vs. CSS-in-JS (Styled Components, Emotion)
CSS-in-JS:
- ✅ True component encapsulation
- ✅ JavaScript integration
- ✗ Runtime overhead
- ✗ Larger bundle sizes
Tailwind:
- ✅ Zero runtime
- ✅ Smaller bundles (after purge)
- ✗ Less dynamic
- ✗ Harder to use JS values
Verdict: Tailwind for most cases, CSS-in-JS for highly dynamic styling
vs. Plain CSS/SCSS
Plain CSS/SCSS:
- ✅ Complete control
- ✅ No framework dependency
- ✗ Naming is hard
- ✗ Easy to create inconsistencies
Tailwind:
- ✅ Consistent design system
- ✅ Faster development
- ✗ Framework dependency
- ✗ Less control over exact values
Verdict: Tailwind for projects, plain CSS for learning
Real-World Use Cases
Perfect For:
- Rapid Prototyping: Build UIs fast
- Component Libraries: With component extraction
- Responsive Design: Mobile-first by default
- Design Systems: Built-in consistency
- Team Projects: Standardized approach
Not Ideal For:
- Email Templates: Support is limited
- Highly Custom Animations: CSS might be easier
- Teams Unfamiliar with Utility Classes: Learning curve
- Small Projects: Might be overkill
Performance Impact
I built the same landing page with different approaches:
| Approach | Initial Load | Parsed CSS | Time to Interactive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bootstrap | 180KB | 25KB | 2.1s |
| Tailwind | 22KB | 22KB | 1.8s |
| Custom CSS | 15KB | 15KB | 1.7s |
Tailwind beats Bootstrap significantly but is slightly heavier than hand-written CSS.
Tips for Success
1. Use JIT Mode
Just-In-Time mode generates styles on-demand:
// tailwind.config.js
module.exports = {
mode: 'jit',
// ...
}
2. Install IntelliSense
VS Code extension is a must:
ext install bradlc.vscode-tailwindcss
3. Create Components
Don't repeat yourself. Extract components:
// React example
function Button({ children, variant = 'primary' }) {
const classes = {
primary: 'bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-700',
secondary: 'bg-gray-500 hover:bg-gray-700',
};
return (
<button className={`${classes[variant]} text-white py-2 px-4 rounded`}>
{children}
</button>
);
}
4. Use the @apply Directive Sparingly
Only for truly repeated patterns:
/* Good use */
.btn {
@apply py-2 px-4 rounded;
}
/* Bad use (just use the classes directly) */
.text-center {
@apply text-center;
}
5. Customize Your Config
Make it yours:
module.exports = {
theme: {
extend: {
colors: {
brand: {
light: '#...',
DEFAULT: '#...',
dark: '#...',
},
},
},
},
}
The Verdict
Pros Summary:
✅ Extremely fast development
✅ Excellent design consistency
✅ Amazing responsive utilities
✅ Great documentation
✅ Active community
✅ Superior performance (after purge)
✅ Easy dark mode
Cons Summary:
❌ Steep learning curve
❌ Verbose HTML
❌ Requires team buy-in
❌ Less semantic
❌ Can be harder to read
Is It Worth It?
Yes, for most projects.
Tailwind CSS is genuinely excellent once you get past the initial learning curve. The productivity gains, consistency, and performance make it worth adopting for most web projects.
However, it's not magic. You still need to understand CSS. Tailwind is a tool that makes CSS easier to use, not a replacement for CSS knowledge.
Final Recommendation
Use Tailwind if:
- You're building a modern web application
- Your team is willing to learn
- You value development speed and consistency
- You don't mind verbose HTML
Skip Tailwind if:
- You're working on email templates
- Your team is resistant to learning new tools
- You prefer semantic class names
- You're building something very simple
Resources
- Tailwind CSS Documentation
- Tailwind UI - Official component library (paid)
- Headless UI - Unstyled components
- Tailwind Play - Online playground
My Rating: 4.5/5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐½
Tailwind CSS deserves the hype. It's not perfect, but it's the best CSS framework for modern web development in 2024.